The Changes in Mickey and Edwards Relationship :: Blood Brothers Willy Russell Essays

The Changes in Mickey and Edwards RelationshipThere In a flash the whole course of your life has been decided, willyou succeed or will you fail? It is not for you to decide, you havehad your freedom taken away from you and you will never trueise untilthe last moments of your frustrated, or enjoyable life and by then itwill be too late. This is Blood Brothers in a nutshell a musicalwhich tears through the walls of social ethics exposing the obvioustruth, wrong and social inequalities roam our Country and thedevices which Russell uses brings this to the audience in a mixture ofspeech, song and verbalize.In this piece of drama coursework focusing on Blood Brothers in that respectwill be several different aspects of the play which will be focusedon. The characters, particularly the main two, will be the fundamentalbuilding blocks of tell the question because once we knoweverything about Mickey and Edward we can then go on to look at theirrelationship changes. Another important elec trical outlet to look at is thedramatic devices used by the director and how this will link to thestructure of the play. Also it would be useful to look at the run-inused as this can give a good insight into the author and on this note,reach into the ideas and themes of the play so we will have a goodview of Willy Russells intentions. Finally looking at the setting tosee more of Russells intentions and the cultural context trying tosee what kind of audience Russell had in mind.Looking at Russells intentions I have come up with three main viewpointsHe just wrote this play as you see it at face value it could be anironic storyline that they are blood brothers but also real brothers,the fact that its a musical is purely for show and entertainment.The evidence for this point of view is one of Russells interviewsabout Educating Rita, where Rita cuts off Franks hair its supposedto be alluding to the cutting of Sampsons hair by Delilah. In factthe real reason was it was supposed to be a c omic gag. So then how dowe know that Russell wrote the play for the general audience and notfor the commentators and critics, maybe he wrote the play to beenjoyed rather than for people to debate the social meanings but justwatch a musical?An alternative view point would advise that Russell saw this as wayto show how difficult it is to be successful or just to lead a good